AS COL support provided in 2023 (with a focus on Maths)

This year, I have been privileged to support and collaborate with the broader Manaikalani community to enhance teacher practice in Maths. This included working with individual teachers, teaching teams across Y1-8, COL colleagues, school and Kahui Ako leaders, and the Maths Design Group. I also provided support for our RTLB colleagues.

Here is a snapshot of my AS COL support:

      

Team Feedback on Maths Programme and Team collaboration this year

This year, I've had the privilege of leading a team of five enthusiastic Y3-6 teachers. It has been an interesting and sometimes challenging experience with a lot of changes: we welcomed some new team members who felt more comfortable teaching literacy than maths. I heard them say, 'I am not a maths person,' multiple times. Furthermore, most of our team had to learn the curriculum for new year levels they hadn't taught before.

Thinking of the wisdom of the famous saying, "Tell me and I forget, teach me and I may remember, involve me and I learn," we involved our newbies in team planning. I believed that involvement and shared responsibility would be the keys to transforming their perception of teaching Math.

I have been always available to model, co-teach, observe, explain maths progressions and resources, help with assessments, etc. Two of my team members had never planned for Year 5-6 maths (Level 3). I supported them by initially planning for those stages at the beginning of the year, gradually passing these responsibilities to them as they developed more knowledge and confidence.

Throughout the year, I observed the need for a universal planning template. So, in Term 3, a new universal planning design emerged, simplifying the planning process and enhancing our teaching and providing consistent learning experiences across our classes. You can read about our planning here.

Last week, I collected feedback from my team, seeking their insights and perspectives on our collaboration, teacher capabilities in maths and areas for improvement as we always strive to provide the best for our learners. Some findings are below:

Did collaborative planning help you deepen your knowledge of the maths curriculum and better understand progressions (stages)?

Teacher #1: Yes- I think the strength comes from different perspectives and how everyone approached the planning of the math curriculum. Elena led the team effectively, ensuring each member knew which progression they were planning while always providing support. This helped us grow stronger in planning, understanding the Maths curriculum and progressions, and how to teach Maths effectively.

Teacher #2: Yes, with having to plan all different stages it deepened my knowledge of the progressions as well as the maths curriculum. I was able to look at what my team had planned which allowed me to have access to more resources. As I had come from teaching year 3 & 4 I had never planned stage 6-7 before which at the beginning of the year I found challenging. With Elena's support and using my team's planning, I was able to gain a deeper understanding of what these stages looked like for all different strands etc.

Teacher #3: I think for me personally (as a fairly inexperienced maths teacher), planning my own lessons has allowed me to deepen my understanding of individual stages one at a time. If I was to have planned for all stages at the same time, I would have likely become overwhelmed. I now feel more successful and confident in teaching maths.

Did team planning help you feel more comfortable and confident when teaching maths?

Teacher #1: Yes! I love that I can bounce ideas off from my colleagues and that I can ask for advice in a safe space. 

Teacher #2: I love the evolution of how the planning templates have developed. Elena was mindful to support her team (most of whom were relatively new to teaching) and as such the planning templates helped to scaffold understanding of concepts and delivery. Even for someone with experience like me, I found them so useful! 

Teacher #3: Absolutely. Now I feel so much more confident teaching maths, I really enjoy working with Elena, Team Kea and using our planning format.

Teacher #4:  Yes, it was great to use the same structured format and also have others' planning as an example when completing my own planning. 

What do you like about our collaborative maths planning and the changes that we made this year?

Teacher #1: As a newbie! I love it, it made planning ahead so much easier and you can find planning and tailor it to suit the needs of our kids. 

Teacher #2: At the beginning, when we started teaching from each other's plans, I found that different teachers’ plans varied to some extent and I found different planning layouts confusing. However after Elena suggested the new planning format and explained it to us, I better understood how to plan for a good maths programme. I loved our Term 4 strand planning idea, I found it extremely helpful having the resource bank of plans that we can use and to slot it into our own classroom programs when needed. 

Teacher #3: I love to plan on the slides, it’s interactive and it is visually appealing. It was great to have  same expectations across classes and maths stages. We also often reflect back on what worked well and what didn’t, which helps improve our maths planning and teaching (since we learn from our mistakes).

Teacher #4: I felt like the pressure of planning was reduced by a significant amount. I wasn't spending all weekend finding/ creating resources and lesson plans. Now with our planning, we are able to put more thought into our lessons and explicitly teach. I find that our learners are getting more out of each lesson and the design is easy for them and the teacher to follow. When I had my student teacher in class, she commented on how easy she found our template and how she found it easy to follow other teachers' planning. 

As a team, we also reflected on the implementation of Maths Matrices to empower our students. 

All of us witnessed the positive impact they've had on empowering our students and engaging our students' whanau. This experience has reinforced our commitment to continue using Maths Matrices next year and beyond.

Monitoring the Effects: Term 3 e-asTTle Comparison Reports (Maths)

In this post, I'd like to share two e-asTTle comparison reports based on the latest assessment conducted in September by my Year 3 and 4 students. I have nine Year 4 students in my class but only two of them didn't sit this test due to their overall learning difficulties (they focus on their IEP goals). There is no e-asttle data available for Year 3 students from other schools.

Using the concept of repeated measures, I've been tracking my students' progress in maths and sharing their results with both them and their whanau. We looked at their individual reports to set up new goals and to see how far they've come and how much they've grown. It was a great opportunity for my learners to talk about their successes and next steps during our end of Term 3 Tamariki Korero. 

Report #1.  How are my students doing compared to students in ALL other NZ schools?

Report #2.  How are my students doing compared to students in SIMILAR schools (low decile)?

E-asTTle offers a range of individual and group reports that I've been using as formative and summative assessments to guide my students toward their learning success. Along with other assessments, I use e-asttle to keep a close eye on student progress and needs and to make teaching adjustments as needed. 

Next year, I will administer the same test at the beginning of Term 1 and then each term to collect data for e-asTTle progress reports and to compare them with PAT results (out of my personal curiosity).

Causal Chain - Improving Teacher Practice and Student Outcomes in Mathematics

I've thought through my Causal Chain to identify the specifics of my inquiry and gain a deeper understanding of how I've been supporting teachers and improving student achievement. 

I'm very excited to be part of the Manaiakalani Maths design group. It's been amazing to experience the team's passionate commitment, deep knowledge and inspiring energy. I eagerly anticipate our continued collaboration and the transformation of our ideas into a practical PLD led by the research team - the PLD  that will truly make a difference for our teachers and learners. 

Literature review #2 - Transfer of Learning by R. Haskell

 Haskell, Robert. Transfer of Learning.

One of my hunches regarding the poor PAT results of our students was that we may not necessarily teach what is being tested. I shared my thoughts on the difference between "teaching to the test" versus teaching the specific math areas that students will be assessed on. I searched the web for any relevant research but couldn't find anything particularly useful until I came across "Transfer of Learning" by Robert Haskell.

Dr. Robert E. Haskell was a Professor of psychology at the University of New England (passes away in 2010), whose work in the area of learning transfer spans a range of disciplines, including math, science, education, business, and psychology.

Haskell's insightful book, 'Transfer of Learning: Cognition, Instruction, and Reasoning,' explores the interesting topic of how we can effectively apply our knowledge in diverse contexts. By exploring the historical roots of transfer and underscoring the importance of building a solid knowledge foundation, Haskell convincingly argues for the significance of explicit teaching and practice. emphasizes the importance of understanding key concepts, strategies, and declarative knowledge in facilitating successful knowledge transfer. The book provides valuable insights on fostering critical thinking and problem-solving skills in students, empowering them to apply their learning to real-world situations.

Just in case, I'd like to explain that declarative knowledge in math involves knowing and understanding the key ideas and concepts that form the foundation of mathematical thinking and problem-solving. It is like the building blocks of learning, providing a solid foundation for further learning, deeper understanding and the ability to apply what you know.

In conclusion, Haskell's work aligns with my belief about the importance of teaching before testing. By emphasizing the need for a strong knowledge base and providing students with explicit instruction, educators can empower students to transfer their learning effectively. Teaching before testing ensures that students have the necessary understanding and skills to approach assessments with confidence. By incorporating Haskell's insights into our teaching practices, we can create a solid foundation for students' academic success and foster their ability to apply their knowledge in real-world contexts.

Literature review #1 - Visible Learning by J. Hattie

John Hattie is a Professor of Education and Director of the Visible Learning Labs, University of Auckland, New Zealand and we all know his famous work "Visible Learning. A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement" first published in 2009. 

I decided to reread his book, especially some parts that I found important for my teaching inquiry this year. According to J Hattie, "The effect size of 0.40 sets a level where the effects of innovation enhance achievement in such a way that we can notice real-world differences, and this should be a benchmark of such real-world change." 

This is a great reminder to all of us that our inquiry into improving our teaching practice, commitment to numerous PLDs, and our aim to develop student agency are vital components in fostering positive student outcomes in mathematics. By focusing on refining the curriculum and our instructional skills as teachers, and prioritizing student engagement and empowerment, we have the potential to make a profound impact on students' mathematical understanding and achievement. 

This research also provides valuable insights into instructional strategies that yield positive results for student learning. When it comes to teaching math, a well-structured program and direct teacher instruction have been found highly effective factors (Hiebert & Grouws, 2007).  Explicit teaching, clear explanations, and demonstrations have a significant impact on student understanding and achievement.

Manipulatives play a crucial role in the early years of mathematics education and show a great effect when working with low-achieving middle school students. They provide concrete experiences that help students build a solid foundation and develop a deep understanding of mathematical concepts (Mitchell, 1987). By engaging students in hands-on activities, manipulatives foster conceptual understanding and lay the groundwork for later abstract thinking.

When it comes to effective teaching strategies, certain approaches have shown particularly promising outcomes. Strategy-based methods, guided practice, peer tutoring, teacher modeling, specific forms of feedback, mastery criteria, sequencing examples, and instruction responsive to feedback have demonstrated high effect sizes (Hattie, 2009). These strategies actively engage students, provide guidance, and create opportunities for practice and feedback, leading to significant improvements in mathematics achievement.

On the other hand, research suggests that peer group strategies and independent practice with technology have relatively lower effect sizes (Hattie, 2009). While they still have some value, working within a peer group and relying heavily on technology for independent practice may not yield as substantial improvements in mathematics learning compared to other approaches.  (I have personally observed similar situations where students collaborate on their independent activities, and despite my reminders that they should only help by explaining rather than telling, it can be challenging to monitor.)

Reading "Visible Learning" by J. Hattie confirmed my hunch and hypotheses about the most important and effective components of teaching mathematics:

• Structured mathematics programs: Comprehensive and organized curricula that provide a framework for effective instruction and learning in mathematics.
• Direct Teacher instruction and modelling: Engaging students through clear explanations, demonstrations, and guidance from the teacher to deepen their understanding of mathematical concepts.
• Strategy-based methods: Teaching students specific problem-solving strategies and approaches to empower them in tackling mathematical tasks effectively.
• Guided practice and feedback: Providing students with opportunities to apply their knowledge through practice activities while receiving targeted feedback to enhance their learning and mastery of mathematical skills.

Citations:

Hiebert, J., & Grouws, D. A. (2007). The effects of classroom mathematics teaching on students' learning. In F. K. Lester Jr. (Ed.), Second Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning (Vol. 2, pp. 371-404). Information Age Publishing.

Mitchell, M. M. (1987). The effects of manipulative materials in mathematics instruction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 18(6), 449-457.

Hattie, J. (2009). Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement. Routledge.

Formulating my Hypothesis to improve teaching of Maths

Based on my previous TAI steps, I identified the following most important hunches for my inquiry:

I believe that 

- updating the maths programme to include all the effective elements of the maths programme (research based) 

- sharing and unpacking Term 1 testing results with our learners, 

- employing student agency - teaching students how to use self-assessment (matrices) to support their own learning, and

- collaborating with other teachers and sharing best practices 

will improve students' learning outcomes and enhance their learning experiences.

Reevaluating and adjusting my, my team's maths programme  to include all the effective elements of the maths programme (research based): number talk, targeted teaching sessions, teacher designed consolidation activities, independent activities and opportunities to apply their knowledge and create in maths (rich tasks and investigations).

By unpacking the term 1 results with students, educators can help them understand their strengths and weaknesses and take ownership of their learning. 

Taking a more data-driven approach by consistently using formative (and summative) assessment tools to inform our teaching.

Training students to self-assess using Maths Matrices to help them identify areas where they need additional support and extra practice. By providing students with the tools they need to support their own learning, educators can help to foster a sense of agency and responsibility in their students.

Teacher collaboration and data sharing are essential in Maths education. By working together and sharing data, educators can identify areas for improvement, set goals, create and share resources, and adjust their teaching practices to improve student outcomes.

Evidence of Improving Teacher practice and Student achievement in Mathematics in GTS

In 2021 I analysed our school data in Maths and raised my concerns with the management. I was thrilled that my voice was heard! This initiative led to a school-wide collaborative inquiry into improving the teaching of mathematics. Last year, we took this inquiry to the next level. After reviewing school Maths Matrices, we focused on two powerful areas: teacher practice and student agency. That meant that we needed to give students both the option to make choices to direct their own learning and the information they needed to make strong choices. Interestingly enough, after unpacking Maths matrices with their students, our teachers began to use these Matrices for their planning. 

Thanks to Johanna's (DP at GTS) data analysis before and after this intervention, we can provide clear evidence of the positive impact of this collaborative approach. 

In her recent Staff presentation, Johanna shared: "The impact of AfL is obvious when you look back on historic ‘normal’ year which is on the left - numbers stayed this same in WB, B, At & Above and compare it to this year on the right where there is a definite shift due to the focus on Assessment for Learning.  Teachers have noticed a difference and students are more engaged.  We still need a lot of work in maths and this will continue in 2023"

I totally agree that collaborative efforts between teachers, school leaders, and students have a significant impact on improving teaching practices and student learning outcomes. 

Using Choice Boards and Subject Matrices to Boost Student Engagement across the Curriculum

In Term 3, my team looked at the ways to transform the way we learn, offer new experiences and create new opportunities for our students to boost their engagement and improve their learning outcomes. 

As GTS has been exploring the role of student agency, we decided to use our new (or refreshed) learning in our classes and introduced Maths matrices and Choice boards in literacy and maths.

When we take students through the curriculum without involving them, we act as learner managers instead of learner empowerers and we miss the opportunity to let students find their own way.  That's why we tried to involve our students by getting their input on how they’d like to demonstrate what they’ve learned. For example, students work with their buddies to practise one of the areas to achieve what's required. Sharing with them what exactly they need to do in order to move up the levels (or stages) showed us a simple way to channel students' learning. Young people are highly competitive and goal-driven. We enjoyed watching them choosing not just a busy activity during their independent learning time but something that will help them achieve their desired goals.   

John Hattie, author and educational researcher of influences and effect sizes related to student achievement, states student efficacy has a .92 effect size on student learning (Visibile Learning 2019). Student efficacy is the understanding that pupils believe they can achieve a complex goal or outcome.

Targeting student agency, we planned and allowed for student involvement in the creation of our choice boards  - this helped increase their ownership and follow-through.

Create Staff Meeting - Silhouette Art workshop

Each term the Manaiakalani Kahui Ako hosts staff meetings as an opportunity for Manaiakalani teachers to connect with our COL Kaupapa and Pedagogy.

This time, my school hosted the Create Staff Meeting and I enjoyed the opportunity to share my practice with other wonderful and creative Manaiakalanai teachers. I was privileged to be supported by my team as this was the first workshop that we presented together. Well done Team Kea!

Burst in Bubbles 2021 - TAI 2021 Evaluation (Maths focus) - #23

Kia Ora, my 2021 inquiry started after collecting my first set of data, when I discovered that 61% of my learners were working well below their expected levels in Mathematics. 

During the profiling phase, I used student voice, formative and summative assessments, and referred to their historical data that revealed a widening gap in their achievements over the past years at school. Sadly, many of these students didn’t believe they could be good at Maths, some said that Maths was too hard for them. Interestingly enough, the same students enjoyed much better results in reading and writing.

So I decided to dig deeper into High leverage practices in mathematics to try to accelerate their learning.

We started by co-constructing positive norms, using Talk Moves and having ongoing conversations about the growth mindset. Soon,  most of my students began to feel more comfortable doing Maths.

During the planning stage of my inquiry, I looked at international results in maths and referred to research and practice of the most successful countries. I questioned myself, about what they’ve been doing differently from New Zealand and from our school.

I identified many differences but focused on the most crucial findings:

• They use well-designed maths programmes supported by textbooks or digital platforms, not depending on individual teachers’ planning
• They value explicit teaching, use of materials and deliberate practice in order to develop student’s ability to transfer their knowledge and skills
• They often revisit topics to build long-term memory and deepen understanding.

Reflecting on these, I restructured my maths programme to accommodate these best practices. For example, I now allow more time for deliberate practice with a gradual release of responsibilities. Another important skill that I’ve been explicitly teaching and practising with my learners is ‘translating’ word problems into maths equations. This definitely helped to improve their comprehension, critical thinking and problem-solving skills. The mid-year data showed some good progress of my learners and I’m now in the process of collecting term 4 data.

I also extended my inquiry across our school. Supported by the management, we had a staff meeting with a focus on maths data, content knowledge, progressions and understanding of assessments. We planned to have a school GLOSS and JAM moderation. Collectively, we reviewed school expectations for planning, use of resources and delivery of mathematics. I tried to support my colleagues by sharing my practice via class on-air and on my blog, by modelling maths lessons, helping with planning and resources and pedagogy behind them. At the beginning of the last lockdown, I curated and shared a collection of digital tools for online learning. 

I believe that the changes that I made this year in my own practice and initiated school-wide will have a great impact on our teachers and learners raising their confidence, engagement and achievements in maths. 

Due to Level 3 in Auckland, the Bursts and Bubbles were conducted online. Below is the video I recorded about my inquiry this year and how I have improved my own practice and supported my colleagues. This year wasn't a usual face-to-face teaching year but there was still some great data and evidence that came out of my inquiry.

Year 4 Maths PAT data - repeated measures - TAI #22

Yesterday, I administered a Year 4 Maths PAT. We started by talking about integrity when doing the test online. The cameras were on all the time with no creative backgrounds and no other people around them. We also had a conversation about how teachers use the test information in their planning. Practice makes perfect - that was our purpose for this test. I used filters to compare the results of the students who participated in Term 1 and Term 4 tests (comparing 'apples to apples'). 

I'm very proud of my students who have shown resilience, great engagement and love of learning during these lockdown times and kept improving their knowledge and skills despite the circumstances!

TAI - cognitive engagement and critical thinking during online learning - #21

It's been a rocky year with a lot of changes in practice due to the lockdown and adapting to prolonged online learning. 

During these times, I tried to continue to run a balanced programme for reading, writing and maths using high leverage practices and the Learn-Create-Share pedagogy. I was pleased with how students responded and participated during online learning.

I designed a number of integrated units using multimodal sites. I believe that this approach helped to differentiate during online learning but also raise students' confidence to participate and contribute. 

I continued with the main part of my TAI 2021 throughout the distance learning times - How will I change my practice to ensure my learners are cognitively engaged and develop their critical thinking skills across the curriculum - and can definitely say that my online learners deepened their critical thinking and stayed cognitively engaged during online learning. I recorded some Class onAir episodes and shared my resources to support these units.

Self-evaluation for Improvement - Taking Actions - TAI#16

How do I prioritise taking action?  Now that I am clear on what problem or issue I am trying to solve, what do I need to do and why?

As explained earlier, my inquiry was extended to the whole school. I initiated a number of conversations with the school leaders and I'm pleased that I was heard. We collectively recognised that we have a problem and we decided to address it at the school level.

What has been done:

- set up the expectations about teaching maths using the right resources 

- organised a PD about using manipulatives and visuals to teach place value at different levels

- did an audit of the class resources, re-distributed them according to the levels and needs. I'm placing an order to top up our materials.

- modelled number talk using ten frames to a BT.

- published Class OnAir episodes about number talk and choral counting

How big is the change that I've initiated? 

I believe this is a big change and it will help improve not only my teaching practice but help other GTS teachers to make a difference in their students' outcomes in maths.

Observation Feedback from the ALIM facilitator and Class onAir supervisor - #13

Over the past months, I had a number of observations.

Rebecca Bishop, our external ALiM facilitator observed my group session. The feedback was highly positive and specific. The main points were: Talk Moves, use of manipulatives to support students' understanding, gradual release, allowing for the productive struggle, making students realise their misconceptions by guided questioning, positive learning environment. 

I also published 4 episodes of my maths lessons on Manaiakalani Class OnAir and received feedback from Anne Sinclair:

'Great lesson Elena and very clearly students were engaged. I liked the way the students had a ‘go' at explaining their strategies and ’talked aloud’ their thinking. The lesson was well paced with spaces for students to contribute and their ideas be confirmed on the whiteboard. The focus on making them our real, everyday norm with ' tidy’ maths answers also helped with the understandings. Your reflection explained the source of their engagement - 'As all of the students were able to think-pair-share, repeat or revoice, add on and agree or disagree with the answers of their peers, I know that they were actively engaged and used their critical thinking’. It was great to see the balance between student and teach talk and time spent on the mat. You made a very relevant point of the importance and value of different ways students see mathematicsand the different pathways they create.'

'...You have a positive approach to teaching and learning and your understanding of the curriculum and engaging the students is evident.'

The coaching feedback was to support my team in implementing mathematical discourse and the use of manipulatives along with a deeper understanding of the learning progressions and acceleration strategies.

Professional reading for Hypothesis Generation - #7

My inquiry is targeting progress not only in mathematics;
however, my class and school data show a strong need to address this issue.
Why the majority of our students are underachieving in maths, what can be done differently? 

To help me generate a hypothesis about aspects of teaching that might contribute to current patterns of learning, I referred to a number of professional reading and had a conversation with a cognition maths facilitator Rebecca Bishop.

#1  Ambitious mathematics for young Pacific learners

This video episode is one of the Developing Mathematical Inquiry Communities lessons that I keep referring to.

The pedagogy is consistent with the findings of best evidence syntheses. The lesson shows the main components of the structured maths programme: a teacher-directed Launch, moves into Group Work followed by each group Sharing Back with the whole class. 

I try to implement all of these elements in my class maths programme too and found that it is very difficult to have a whole-class launch or Number Talk with my class as I have learners at Stage 5 and Stage 1-2. So I have to split the class into groups during the explicit teacher teaching time. For problem-solving, I often use Low floor - High ceiling problems so my students could participate and develop their confidence and creativity in maths.

Hands Up if You Think that You Are a Good Mathematician... - #5

In my first Class OnAir episode, I asked my students to raise their hands up if they think that they are good mathematicians... only 3 hands went up. It showed me that the students didn't have a positive attitude towards maths and didn't believe in themselves.

I also collected student voice - disposition data and discovered that all of my underachieving students had rather negative beliefs about themselves as mathematicians. It was a strong signal to start building up their confidence by talking about Growth Mindset and implementing Talk Moves to support the positive norms in maths class.

I believe that the positive learning classroom culture goes beyond the ‘classroom treaty’ created in the first week of school. The positive norms in maths class needed to be constructed together so that students know what is expected of them and for them to have the tools to respond to and meet those expectations.

I want my students to work collaboratively and engage in mathematical discussions by sharing and explaining their thinking and reflecting on the thinking of others. To achieve this we have ongoing discussions around how we work together and what is important to become better mathematicians.

I believe that my students have now started to value productive struggle and they are now keen to participate in our Number Talks as they aren't afraid to take risks and make mistakes.

Manaiakalani Teacher Only Day Presentation

At the end of Term 1, Ko te Kāhui Ako o Manaiakalani had a Teacher Only Day with a focus on effective pedagogy in Reading. We had a fantastic presentation by Dr Rae Si'ilata who briefly reminded us about the High-leverage practices.  Then she talked about culturally responsive pedagogy, her own experiences as a learner, and focused on effective bilingual/biliteracy practice for Pasifika learners in our schools.

During the day, teachers attended three other workshops to learn from our Manaiakalani colleagues - educators that know our tamariki, know our community, know our successes and challenges.  

I was privileged to present and share some aspects of my practice around Shared Reading and Integrated Learning. The feedback that I got from my colleagues and their enthusiasm during the workshop was very rewarding; Some of my colleagues said that I gave them ideas and strategies that they would like to implement into their practice in Term 2. 

The two workshops that I attended were full of practical ideas and resources. I look forward to using my new learning in Term 2. 

I think it was a great day to learn from each other, give and receive feedback and reflect on my own practice! 

Manaiakalani TOD website

Year 2-3 Collaborative Learn-Create-Share Book Week project

My personal goals:

Engage and collaborate with my team by involving them in the cross-curricular LCS project from the planning stage to the celebration of the school Book Day in 3 weeks

Provide our students with meaningful and exciting experiences based on their interests.

Day #1 

• Collecting student voice/ interests - Learner Identity

• Oral language 

• Vocabulary 

• Critical thinking

• Collecting and analysing data

• Love of learning 

• Creativity (Drama, Visual arts including modern visual arts which use technology: photography, video, filmmaking, etc)

• Cybersmart across the curriculum

• Learn-Create-Share!!!

What a day we had! Full of fun, reading, learning, creating and sharing our reading preferences and favourite books. We had to work together in a respectful manner and give our opinions. We, teachers, were blown away by our students' ideas and thinking! It was a long day but our young learners were absolutely enthusiastic to participate in this project. They took ownership of their learning and were proud to express their learner identities.

Our students' ideas:

The feedback from my colleagues after the beginning of this project was very rewarding. They found that their students were highly engaged and motivated during various follow-up writing and reading activities.  The outcomes were impressive quantity- and quality-wise. Even the reluctant writers asked to extend their writing time to complete their work.

We will meet and share our wonderful learning next Friday! The students are very excited to share with other students and find out what the other classes created during the week.