Optimising Maths Programme: a comprehensive Weekly and Daily Planning Approach.

As we're approaching the end of term 3, I'd like to share my team's innovative weekly and daily planning format, designed to make our maths program transparent to all stakeholders: teachers, relievers, students and whanau. Through collaborative efforts with my team, we've refined our approach to create engaging learning experiences that are visible, accessible, rewindable, practical and efficient. Explore our format, complete with built-in formative assessments and easily accessible teaching and  learning resources. Our planning promotes academic growth while enhancing teacher capability and subject knowledge, nurturing student agency and strengthening connections with whanau.

The structure of the weekly and daily planning has been working well for our year 3-6 classes. Students are seen twice a week with a flow of purposeful activities to practice new concepts and maintain their maths knowledge.

Built-in assessments. Using ARBS, ixl.com (but it can be any math program, including StudyLadder, Splash Maths, etc), book tasks and Figure Me Out activities, teachers are collecting rich evidence of student progress and identifying their next steps - built-in formative assessment for learning.

This structure also allows for visible, accessible and rewindable learning. From my own experience, the students who were absent from school used this planning to continue learning and work on the same topics as the students at school. I only had to do a couple of quick workshops to support them when they returned.

Revision and review. This planning helps to review and revisit the topics when students are working independently on their own maths goals (self-reflection and teacher feedback)

Reliever-friendly. Relievers were also able to pick up this plan and continue to teach according to the weekly plan with limited learning interruptions.

Whanau feedback is also positive. Parents have commented that they know exactly what the kids are learning, and, according to some parents, this format has helped them better understand their child's math education (which was an interesting comment).

Planning explained:

Using Choice Boards and Subject Matrices to Boost Student Engagement across the Curriculum

In Term 3, my team looked at the ways to transform the way we learn, offer new experiences and create new opportunities for our students to boost their engagement and improve their learning outcomes. 

As GTS has been exploring the role of student agency, we decided to use our new (or refreshed) learning in our classes and introduced Maths matrices and Choice boards in literacy and maths.

When we take students through the curriculum without involving them, we act as learner managers instead of learner empowerers and we miss the opportunity to let students find their own way.  That's why we tried to involve our students by getting their input on how they’d like to demonstrate what they’ve learned. For example, students work with their buddies to practise one of the areas to achieve what's required. Sharing with them what exactly they need to do in order to move up the levels (or stages) showed us a simple way to channel students' learning. Young people are highly competitive and goal-driven. We enjoyed watching them choosing not just a busy activity during their independent learning time but something that will help them achieve their desired goals.   

John Hattie, author and educational researcher of influences and effect sizes related to student achievement, states student efficacy has a .92 effect size on student learning (Visibile Learning 2019). Student efficacy is the understanding that pupils believe they can achieve a complex goal or outcome.

Targeting student agency, we planned and allowed for student involvement in the creation of our choice boards  - this helped increase their ownership and follow-through.

Student Agency Readings - LCS and the integrated curriculum

Student inquiry is a teacher-supported process that provides a structure for students to learn through the process of inquiring into questions they develop themselves about a topic or concept. There are various models of student inquiry and I reviewed and reflected on a number of different models.

Interesting Points

The LCS approach to learning is based on the belief that students are powerful learners who must be actively engaged in the process of investigating, processing, organising, synthesising, refining and extending their knowledge within a topic. They also are able to work collaboratively and develop their key competencies while working on their LCS projects.

Teachers have to provide a clear structure and share their expectations of student learning. To make this process purposeful and enjoyable, teachers have to put a lot of effort into planning and collecting student voice.

Another interesting point that resonated with my view of the LCS process is the use of an integrated curriculum. Such an approach gives students a real purpose for learning and provides real-life experiences which in order help students see the world as a complex system rather than a number of separated topics. "The coherence principle states that “the curriculum offers all students a broad education that makes links within and across learning areas”

(Ministry of Education, 2007, p. 9, emphasis added)

The LCS (or inquiry) learning supports the development of students' critical thinking.

Concerns I have from within the reading

From my own experience, I know that LCS requires a high level of organisation, flexibility and negotiation skills to challenge the range of diverse learners. It requires a lot of careful planning and structured delivery. LCS can be messy and noisy due to the students' enthusiasm and drive.

My concern is mostly about inquiry learning in the ILE. Teachers have to be on the same page with their expectations and standards and have a high level of trust between them and learners.

New learning from this reading

It was interesting to read about different models and approaches to inquiry learning. Different schools and teachers use different models that suit them, their beliefs and their learners. It was great to see various rubrics for teachers to measure the quality of inquiry learning and outcomes. We used some of these ideas when working on the Team Kea LCS model.

What excites and enthuses me from this reading?

I personally love the integrated learning and LCS approach as I see these as great opportunities for students to learn in an authentic context, not to mention their enthusiasm and motivation! I believe that the LCS approach takes students beyond what they already know and supports the development of important lifelong skills and key competencies.

Reflection

The more knowledge we have about inquiry learning, the better our common understanding of all aspects of LCS becomes. I actually was excited to see that my team's understandings of the LCS process are pretty similar. I believe this is a result of our close teamwork and collaboration.

Thinking about my learners, I believe that during inquiry learning, peer learning becomes as effective as teacher-led learning. Some meaningful “aha!” moments often come in authentic interactions with other students. Sometimes, during the LCS projects, the class transforms into a space where everyone can try different roles: a teacher, a facilitator, a leader, an IT guru etc and has something to share! Inquiry-based learning triggers students' critical thinking and problem-solving capacities and pushes them to take action instead of learning passively.

It was great to have these readings done before and during our work on the Team Kea LCS model as we kept referring to different ideas and models and synthesized them into our own pilot LCS model that we are excited to implement in term 4.

Readings:

http://pjsibpyp.weebly.com/uploads/1/1/2/3/11231090/inquirymurdochwilson.pdf

http://pjsibpyp.weebly.com/uploads/1/1/2/3/11231090/kath_murdochs_inquiry_model.pdf  This has awesome components for students to know what they should be doing / working through that you can add to Learn, Create, Share

https://www.nzcer.org.nz/system/files/set2012_3_015.pdf  This reading is more of an academic read, but gives great information.